
A few months ago I read a newspaper article about a guy who had been sentenced to five years in prison for smashing a pint glass in a pub and slashing another patron's face with it. The victim had been left permanently scarred. I think it is only right that a person or persons responsible for the disfigurement of another human being should pay the ultimate penalty available under our legal system. I also think a similar punishment should apply to those who disfigure and scar society by deliberate and contrived methods.
Britain has been disfigured by Labour's 13 years of floodgate immigration. A succeeding government should - both in theory and practice - be able to reverse the policies and societal consequences of its predecessor. That is the meaning of true democracy. In the past it was relatively straightforward. A Labour administration could, for example, beef up the power of the trades unions; a new Conservative government could reverse that decision in accordance with the expressed desire of the electorate articulated through preference at the ballot box. David Cameron could - quite legally if he wanted to upon taking power - abolish the devolved assemblies, cut down on benefit payments, get rid of ASBOs, slash borrowing to ease the debt burden....... or change any number of Labour policies on health, education, defence, welfare and international development. However, what he cannot do (for Britain is civilised nation, not a fascist state) is to kick out all those immigrants who have been given citizenship or indefinite leave to remain under Blair and Brown. That's what makes immigration policy different, and that's why pursuing open-door immigration to deliberately and irrevocably change the face of the nation without the consent of those who have to endure its consequences is the most blatant act of unspeakable evil committed by this wretched lot.
For where in successive Labour manifestos did it promise to make Britain unrecognisable through the mass importation of foreigners and foreign cultures? It didn't. So it's not as though immigration and multi-culti worshippers can argue that British voters gave their permission for such a huge change. Three million immigrants have come to this country since 1997. Never mind a Chilcott inquiry over Iraq, there needs to be another inquiry on how Labour ministers contrived to **** up our demographic make-up through the facilitation of Poles, Indians, Africans, Pakis, Aztecs, Incas, Indus Pygmies, Amazonian tribesmen and all the other aliens who've come here in unprecedented numbers. And that inquiry should have recourse to penal sentencing for the crime of 'disfigurement of the British nation'.
Take Reading as a good example of how Labour has irreversibly damaged this country. In a town of less than 150,000 people, 150 laguages are now spoken by kids in the local schools. 150!!! We're not talking about a Tokyo-sized metropolis here. It's a Berkshire town 30 miles west of London for God's sake. Ruined by the dilution of Britishness and the strains on local services that such a migrant deluge creates. No future government will be able to boot them out. They are here to stay, folks. It may be totally un-Christain to say this, but I hope those Labour apparatchiks responsbile for killing our country suffer all the personal misfortune life can throw at them in later years. Such despicable scum deserve no less.