DV TWITTERING

RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
THE PRICE OF REWARDING TERRORISM

You do not defeat terrorism by rewarding terrorists, regardless of how many bleeding heart liberals argue otherwise. Want to know where that flawed approach leads to? Read UNIONISM DECAYED 1997-2007 - It's my first book and it explains what happens when you seeek to appease terrorists and call it peace. It's available right now for ATW readers so make sure you get your copy by emailing the editor! This is the book that dissents from the herd mentality that doing wrong can lead to being right. It doesn't and this book spells out WHY.

HIT THE TIP JAR!
More About This Website

 

THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT

We'd really like to have you comment on our site! We want good conversation, no abuse and no trolls. I reserve the right to ban anybody who wilfully and persistently breaks these rules. So go ahead and speak your mind!

Can America Trust the BBC?


"I do remember... the corridors of Broadcasting House were strewn with empty champagne bottles. I'll always remember that", Jane Garvey, BBC Five Live, May 10th, 2007, recalling May 2nd, 1997.

Login
Powered by Squarespace
Powered by Squarespace
SEARCH ATW
SITEMETER

« GREEN SHOOTS OF RECOVERY EVERYWHERE! | Main | BLAMING THE VICTIMS.. »
Friday
06Nov2009

A MAJOR VICTIM?

So, in true fashion, it turns out that the mass murderer Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan is actually the VICTIM.

Yes, you see his aunt Noel (?) Hasan of Falls Church, Va., said he had endured name-calling and harassment about his Muslim faith for years after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and had sought for several years to be discharged from the military.

She knows all about this racism

“I know what that is like; I have experienced it myself while working as a bank executive.”

Ah - that would be those racist Americans for you!

Poor Nidal - the pain he had to suffer. But at least he had his faith.

"He came to mosque one or two times to see if there were any suitable girls to marry,” Khan said. “I don't think he ever had a match, because he had too many conditions. He wanted a girl who was very religious, prays five times a day, which is all very good.”

So, a devout Muslim.  Got that?

Then, of course, we discover he also thought he was Palestinian, even though he was born in the USA.

On a form filled out by those seeking spouses through a program at the mosque, Hasan listed his birthplace as Arlington, Va., but his nationality as Palestinian, Khan said. "I don't know why he listed Palestinian," Khan said, "He was not born in Palestine."

So, we have one picture of Nidal as a poor oppressed but devout Muslim who considered himself Palestinian.

Then there is the other one of a evil mass murdering Islamic Jihadist.

Wonder which one the media will run with....?

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (13)

The best analysis of the Fort Hood jihad is by Robert Spencer at 'JIHADWATCH', with frequent updates.


http://www.jihadwatch.org/2009/11/fort-hood-jihad-shooter-handed-out-korans-the-morning-of-his-attack.html

Friday, November 6, 2009 at 01:29PM | Unregistered CommenterGeorge R

It's every liberal to the the BBC barricades where they can't quite make up their minds if Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was off to Iraq or Afghanistan, but hey - he was stressed about going somewhere!

Meanwhile, at the Associated Press:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091106/ap_on_re_us/us_fort_hood_shooting
FORT HOOD, Texas – Soldiers who witnessed the shooting rampage at Fort Hood that left 13 people dead reported that the gunman shouted "Allahu Akbar!" before opening fire, the base commander said Friday [.....]

The motive for the shooting wasn't clear

Oh it's quite clear. In fact, the MSM is in full on "Man Of No Definite Appearance Or Religion" mode:

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100015948/hmm-cant-imagine-what-major-malik-nadal-hasans-motivation-could-have-been/

It's almost "Gee, a devout muslim, cries of allahu akhbar and a massacre - that Bush's foreign policy for- oh sod it, travelling stresses him out."

Friday, November 6, 2009 at 02:28PM | Registered CommenterPete Moore

This is b.s. Majors in the army are not harrassed. He outranks 95% of the military. A total bullshit story.

Friday, November 6, 2009 at 02:55PM | Registered CommenterCharles in Texas

Charles

Glad you are OK

We were worrying about you

Were you near the sad events?

Friday, November 6, 2009 at 02:57PM | Registered CommenterThe Phantom

Charles - good to see you.

Friday, November 6, 2009 at 03:04PM | Registered CommenterPete Moore

The BBC are taking the same line. From http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8346078.stm

"His cousin told US media that Maj Hasan had been opposed to an imminent deployment overseas, describing it as his "worst nightmare".

He also said that Maj Hasan had been battling racial harassment because of his "Middle Eastern ethnicity". "

So the conclusion is racism by white people made him do it.

Friday, November 6, 2009 at 03:10PM | Registered CommenterMark

Thanks mates. A very trying day yesterday. Tears are pretty close to the surface today, but I'm essential personnel and have a shift to pull at the hospital. Got a job to do as they say.

It's something to be a quarter mile from such a thing, being in lock down, passing MP's in full battle gear with M-16s But God put me here for a reason, to take care of these soldiers and their families.

Friday, November 6, 2009 at 03:13PM | Registered CommenterCharles in Texas

I think the story will fall into place that he was a very mentally troubled person who became violent as mentally troubled persons sometimes do. His Muslim faith should neither serve as his excuse or a basis for blame.

Friday, November 6, 2009 at 04:20PM | Registered CommenterMahons

Mahons, your comment is the example per excellence of the wishy-washy self-hating liberal looking for any excuse to blame anything but the doctrine of hate. But, in your defence, it was a full moon recently, was it not? Perhaps that had something to do with this rampage?

Friday, November 6, 2009 at 08:50PM | Unregistered CommenterAllan@Aberdeen

Unfortunately Mahons - islam provides the perfect justification for acting out in this horribly destructive way. It's a GOOD thing. They go to heaven for doing it.

Glad to hear you're okay, Charles. I had no idea that you were so close to it. My prayers go out to all of the victims, families and everyone there.

Friday, November 6, 2009 at 11:23PM | Registered CommenterGrizzly Mama / Troll

Allan - The hate I've seen on this site mostly comes from you. Why not enlist and go fight the foe you caution us against?

Troll - The vast majority of Muslims in this country are horrfied by this. Anyone who supports this (and no doubt foreign Islamic radicals would) eserves our scorn.

Saturday, November 7, 2009 at 02:24AM | Registered CommenterMahons

Well Mahons, at 48 I'm a bit too old to enlist in the Army, and I see no point in the Army being in Afghanistan in some misguided effort to 'civilise' the uncivilisable. But I have joined the BNP, I am an activist and I donate regularly to the one party which really does oppose islamisation and the liberal traitors who let the scum of the earth wander freely into our countries.

Saturday, November 7, 2009 at 02:31PM | Unregistered CommenterAllan@Aberdeen

"A Muslim veteran affairs organization says it has not received reports of harassment from Islamic soldiers, contrary to claims by a relative of the man authorities say is responsible for the worst mass killing on a U.S. military base.

Abdul-Rashid Abdullah, deputy director of the American Muslim Armed Forces and Veterans Affairs Council, told FoxNews.com that the nonprofit group has not received a single report recently of a U.S. soldier being harassed "simply because he was Muslim."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,572588,00.html

Saturday, November 7, 2009 at 08:18PM | Registered CommenterCharles in Texas

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>