« raunch culture | Main | THE CONSTITUTIONAL POSITION IS SETTLED... »

An affront to democracy

A few days ago I mounted an article in which I outlined why I would not be voting DUP. Some of the comments it generated suggested that I should endorse another party or an independent anti-agreement candidate.

I respect the views of those who believe that one should always use their vote. But I am of the opinion that this election is not democratic.

The choice which people face in this election is, I feel, very much akin to that in Eastern Europe when it was dominated by the Soviets.

The people could vote but they could only vote for candidates from one party. The election result was predetermined before a single vote was cast.

On March 7th the voters have a “choice” between four main parties all of whom advocate the same government – a coalition in which all of them will have places as of right.

On the other hand, I could vote Alliance who would like to be part of the aforementioned government but won’t get enough votes to secure an executive position.

In what other country would a preparation for government committee meet long before an election is even called?

Where else in the world could all the main parties be sure that they would have a place at the cabinet table given any conceivable result?

Our forefathers didn’t die in two world wars for this.

They died to prevent those who used violence to impose their will upon free peoples from achieving political power.

This election, on the other hand, has only been called because the Prime Minister is “convinced” that all the main political parties in Northern Ireland are prepared to share power with those who killed and maimed in order to further their objectives.

Why don’t I vote for the anti-agreement candidates?

Well, as we all know there is no such thing as an anti-agreement DUP candidate. All “Democratic” Unionists standing in this election have signed a resignation letter which can be triggered as and when the leadership sees fit.

On the other hand, I could vote for one of the half dozen Bob McCartneys.

The fact that Mr McCartney is running in so many constituencies detracts from the very serious points which he is making about the Belfast/St Andrews Agreement.

Mr McCartney is saying many things with which I wholeheartedly agree but he has allowed himself to become the butt of jokes by standing in so many constituencies.

The parallels with Rainbow George are inescapable.

So I’m not going to vote in this election – it’s an affront to democracy.

Posted on Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 11:16AM by Registered CommenterSamuel Morrison in | Comments73 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (73)

Sam, go vote, vote for the Rainbowman or nearest equivilent or spoil your ballot. I'm thinking of writing "I don't vote for fools" on mine.

You have to put down a marker, otherwise they'll just look at the percentages and claim a "mandate" and an expense account.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 11:56AM | Unregistered CommenterNRG
NRG, I intend to spoil my vote in a similar way.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 11:58AM | Registered CommenterSamuel Morrison
PS I don't like being called Sam. It's Sammy or Samuel:)
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 11:59AM | Registered CommenterSamuel Morrison
Samuel,

Go and spoil your vote. That way, you register your disgust without staying silent.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 12:03PM | Unregistered CommenterDavid Vance
Just one point on spoiling your vote. Don't write anything libelious as your ballot can be traced back to you.

It isn't really a secret ballot.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 01:05PM | Unregistered CommenterChris Gaskin
Samuel

As I posted earlier I intend voting Alliance. Not because I think they're a great party but because they're non-tribal -- or so they say.

Not a hair on my right palm would induce me to vote for the unpleasant extremists DUP and SF. The SDLP and UUP are slightly better, but like I say, too sectarian.

Green is good of course, and so is indie to some extent. But it's Alliance for me. You're probably correct that they won't get enough votes to make the Executive, but at least if enough peeps choose them it sends out a message to the bigots who'll be occupying Stormont.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 01:15PM | Unregistered CommenterDawkins
<Q>It isn't really a secret ballot.</Q>

Indeed - a good reason to vote SF if one lives in Provo Territory ? ;)
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 01:16PM | Registered CommenterMadradin Ruad
There are lots of good reasons to vote for Sinn Féin ;)
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 01:20PM | Unregistered CommenterChris Gaskin
LOL - and RSF in former SF territory mo chara ?
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 01:28PM | Registered CommenterMadradin Ruad
You all need a thriving Monster raving Looney Party in N.I. to vote for.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 01:32PM | Unregistered CommenterColm
Chris,

IMO there are more reasons NOT to vote Sinn Féin.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 01:33PM | Unregistered CommenterDawkins

Dawkins, why is the SDLP too sectarian?
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 01:45PM | Unregistered CommenterCunningham
Because they're almost 100% Catholic/Nationalist.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 01:53PM | Unregistered CommenterDawkins
Colm,

We have a surfeit of them thank you very much!
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 01:57PM | Unregistered CommenterDavid Vance
"former SF territory"

No such beast

"IMO there are more reasons NOT to vote Sinn Féin."

That is your opinion and your choice, Isn't Democracy great! ;)

"You all need a thriving Monster raving Looney Party in N.I. to vote for"

We have one, it's the UKUP
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 01:59PM | Unregistered CommenterChris Gaskin
<Q>No such beast</Q>

Read your Own Blog Chris ;)

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:10PM | Registered CommenterMadradin Ruad
Cunningham - have you read Paddy Devlin's Autobiography ? The SDLP started out as a left of center party which could have gone either way - Hume and the Knights took it towards the Catholic Right.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:12PM | Registered CommenterMadradin Ruad
Chris

"Isn't Democracy great! ;)"

Sure is. And that's why I'll be voting.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:13PM | Unregistered CommenterDawkins
MR

There is no such thing as former Sinn Féin territory

The dissidents dropped in leaflets the other night, pitch black with hoods on and when I opened the door I thought it was Linford Christie he was running that fast out the gate.

Real dissident territory that ;)
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:14PM | Unregistered CommenterChris Gaskin
<em>the Knights</em>

Scary people!
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:14PM | Unregistered CommenterChris Gaskin

Even if true, that's an absurd argument, Dawkins. It's like saying no Catholic should ever join the UUP because it's a sectarian organisation.

The policies of the party are what count, not the religious background of its members. Because if the "sectarian" background of SDLP members were important, it would have to be reflected in the party's policies. And it ain't.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:16PM | Unregistered CommenterCunningham

The above referred to Davkins'

>>Because they (the SDLP) are almost 100% Catholic/Nationalist.<<
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:17PM | Unregistered CommenterCunningham
Out of my curious nature I have to ask if there are a number of folks who feel the same way can't they organize their own party, or is Sam in a distinct fringe position. I don't mean to disparge his opinion, I am just curious at the alleged lack of alternatives.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:20PM | Unregistered Commentermahons
<Q>Scary people!</Q>

Aren't you one of them ? ;)
Clean-living nice Catholic boy - you would fit right in! ;)
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:28PM | Registered CommenterMadradin Ruad
Mahons,
I don't see any political party which I can vote for at the moment.

Perhaps one will be formed in the future but I am currently of the opinion that politics corrupts. Northern Irish politics corrupts absolutely.

PS Thanks for putting your point so politely:)
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:32PM | Registered CommenterSamuel Morrison
<em>Aren't you one of them ? ;)</em>

I was asked to join a couple of years ago, that was after the local stoop Knight heard I was training to be a Solicitor but before he learned I was a Shinner ;)
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:33PM | Unregistered CommenterChris Gaskin
Now I KNOW you are one of us deep down Chris :)
A real fenian would join, infiltrate and subvert LOL
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:36PM | Registered CommenterMadradin Ruad
<em>A real fenian would join, infiltrate and subvert</em>

Something my Comrades suggested after they heard I refused to join. In my defense I would like to make it known that membership of secret societies is forbidden in Sinn Féin.

I was merely following party rules ;)
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:39PM | Unregistered CommenterChris Gaskin
Cunningham

"The policies of the party are what count, not the religious background of its members."

With respect, are you an Ulsterman? I'm not. That's why for me your political scene is so alien. Perhaps you've grown so accustomed to your political parties being constituted along tribal lines that you believe it's the norm. It isn't. Most of the world's democracies aren't arranged that way. The arrangement sucks, the GFA did no more than copper-fasten the tribal system, and NI will not take its place among the civilized nations until it's put this sectarian nonsense behind it.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:39PM | Unregistered CommenterDawkins
Samuel: Is it a feeling that there was a party you use to support but they've cahnged on some fundamental pricipal that you no longer feel able to support them?
I myself tend to vote for the lesser of two evils each time and I am not sure if I ever really voted with happiness in a national election.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:42PM | Unregistered Commentermahons
<em>NI will not take its place among the civilized nations</em>

The 6 counties is not a nation, never has been and never will be!
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:42PM | Unregistered CommenterChris Gaskin
"GFA did no more than copper-fasten the tribal system"

Correct. And didn't Alliance help negotiate the deal?
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:44PM | Registered CommenterSamuel Morrison
<Q>I was merely following party rules ;)</Q>

Cough, cough - at your level rules are for underlings!
Unlike Mary Lou, you are no doughnut LOL
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:44PM | Registered CommenterMadradin Ruad
<Q>The 6 counties is not a nation, never has been and never will be!</Q>

Neither is Ireland ;) Ireland is merely an island!
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:45PM | Registered CommenterMadradin Ruad
Chris

"<em>NI will not take its place among the civilized nations</em>

The 6 counties is not a nation, never has been and never will be!"

Thanks for illustrating my point. If you peeps spent less time bickering over names and other trivia, some headway might be made.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:49PM | Unregistered CommenterDawkins
<em>Cough, cough - at your level rules are for underlings!</em>

At my level? I don't have underlings

<em>Unlike Mary Lou, you are no doughnut</em>

Neither is Mary Lou ;)

<em>Neither is Ireland</em>

Of course it is, Bunreacht na hÉireann makes that very clear.

Show me a single piece of legislation or convention that makes up British Constitutional law that even suggests that the 6 counties is a nation?

I have evidence to support the Irish nation, is there any evidence to support the 6 county one?
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:49PM | Unregistered CommenterChris Gaskin
Mahons,
All the political parties have bought into a deal which is immoral and undemocratic.

Unionist politicians have been so interested in keeping their pay packets and fancy offices that they have forgotten about what is best for the Union.

In my opinion the lesser of the two evils is not voting for any of them because by voting I would imply that I agree with the political system in NI.

I do not.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:50PM | Registered CommenterSamuel Morrison
<em>If you peeps spent less time bickering over names and other trivia</em>

My post-modernist feminist Gender law lecturer always instilled in me the importance of language.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:50PM | Unregistered CommenterChris Gaskin
NI is not a nation.

Neither is Ireland.

Any legislation passed by a Dublin Parliament post partition only applied to 26 of the 32 counties.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:56PM | Registered CommenterSamuel Morrison
<Q>I have evidence to support the Irish nation</Q>

Good for you :) But we were discussing Ireland, which is an Island. How can a lump of rock and topsoil be a nation? There may or may not be "an" Irish nation - but Ireland is no more a nation than St Kilda :)
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:57PM | Registered CommenterMadradin Ruad
I think the Unionism has taken a wrong turn in remaining focused on parocial self interest instead of seeking responsibility as part of the governance of the entire United Kingdom. A few tought decisions that might be short term unpopular at home would enhance Unionist credibility and effectiveness in Westminister.

Popularist mudslinging does not suggest you have the capability to be allowed to look after yourself.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:57PM | Unregistered CommenterNRG
The Irish nation extend across the entire Island of Ireland.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 02:59PM | Unregistered CommenterChris Gaskin
<Q>My post-modernist feminist Gender law lecturer always instilled in me the importance of language.</Q>

The devil is indeed in the detail :)
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 03:04PM | Registered CommenterMadradin Ruad
I think it could be the Jesuits MR ;)
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 03:05PM | Unregistered CommenterChris Gaskin
Chris

"My post-modernist feminist Gender law lecturer always instilled in me the importance of language."

Names aren't language. They don't count in Scrabble®.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 03:38PM | Unregistered CommenterDawkins
<em>They don't count in Scrabble®.</em>

We are not talking about scrabble, we are talking about politics.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 07:01PM | Unregistered CommenterChris Gaskin
might have been a typo Chris - Republican politics = ScraMble ? ;)
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 07:06PM | Registered CommenterMadradin Ruad
Or how about "Squabble" ? ;)
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 07:08PM | Registered CommenterMadradin Ruad
MR, stop! Your attempt at humour is about as good as your dress sense i.e bellbottoms ;)
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 07:17PM | Unregistered CommenterChris Gaskin
Bellbottoms! LOL.. Could this be true MR?
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 08:11PM | Unregistered CommenterJG

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>