DV TWITTERING

RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
THE PRICE OF REWARDING TERRORISM

You do not defeat terrorism by rewarding terrorists, regardless of how many bleeding heart liberals argue otherwise. Want to know where that flawed approach leads to? Read UNIONISM DECAYED 1997-2007 - It's my first book and it explains what happens when you seeek to appease terrorists and call it peace. It's available right now for ATW readers so make sure you get your copy by emailing the editor! This is the book that dissents from the herd mentality that doing wrong can lead to being right. It doesn't and this book spells out WHY.

HIT THE TIP JAR!
More About This Website

 

THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT

We'd really like to have you comment on our site! We want good conversation, no abuse and no trolls. I reserve the right to ban anybody who wilfully and persistently breaks these rules. So go ahead and speak your mind!

Can America Trust the BBC?


"I do remember... the corridors of Broadcasting House were strewn with empty champagne bottles. I'll always remember that", Jane Garvey, BBC Five Live, May 10th, 2007, recalling May 2nd, 1997.

Login
Powered by Squarespace
Powered by Squarespace
SEARCH ATW
SITEMETER

« ISLAM TAKEAWAY | Main | SPEND NOW, PAY LATER! »
Tuesday
25Nov2008

ANYTHING GOES

It was Cole Porter who wrote the witty lyric "In olden days a glimpse of stocking was looked on as something shocking now heaven knows, anything goes". Ain't that the truth!

"A mother shocked by seeing two half-naked men having sex while out walking the dogs with her daughter was told by police to take a different route in future. Marie Cragg, 44, spoke of her disgust at the officers' reaction and said she feared the woodland beauty spot would be turned into a no-go area for ordinary members of the public. "I called the police and never heard anything back,' Miss Cragg said. 'Then later I was talking to the community officers, and they said they knew what goes on and I should change our walk. 'You should not have to see that, should you? They can go into the woods and go wherever they want - it's sick. 'They saw me and didn't care and just carried on. I could have been a childminder with kids. I would rather go past a gang of hoodies - they are making the place seedy.'

Doesn't surprise me. Since we cannot be judgemental of others behaviour any longer, then I am afraid gay sex in public spaces is all part of the (un)natural consequences which flow from this liberal mantra. Pity the families that like to enjoy the freedom of walking in public spaces - militant gays now own this and will do as they wish and bugger the consequences.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (11)

'Bugger the consequences'.....yes !!! and bugger each other too !!!!

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 08:25AM | Unregistered CommenterWilliam

I speak as a gay man in saying that this is not acceptable in exactly the same way that if a heterosexual couple were engaged in public sex, that would not be acceptable. Sexuality is not the issue here.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 08:59AM | Unregistered CommenterJaz

"Since we cannot be judgemental of others behaviour any longer ..."

Not strictly true as the 10000 on the list can tell you.

Some are obviously more equal than others.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 09:26AM | Unregistered CommenterPeter Thomson

It looks like someone also had a go at that tree in the 2nd picture in the link.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 09:58AM | Unregistered CommenterNOEL CUNNINGHAM

Well said, Jaz.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 08:58PM | Registered CommenterTom Tyler

Sexuality is not the issue here.

Exactly. Most people don't want to watch any kind of sex in the public square. Keep it behind closed doors, please. If you must indulge in plein air, do it in your own walled garden.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 09:36PM | Unregistered CommenterDaphne

"If you must indulge in plein air, do it in your own walled garden."

And in these days of google earth, you might want to consider a roof.

Although I suppose it isn't exactly outdoors then ...

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 09:52PM | Unregistered CommenterFrank O'Dwyer

I feel I ought to comment here,(it's my duty) but I can't think of anything sufficiently smutty yet ;)

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 10:00PM | Unregistered CommenterColm

Sorry Jaz, but it *is* the issue here. A straight couple behaving like this in a public space would have had the police combing the woods looking to do them for indecent exposure et al, but the gay communidee gets a free pass as always. Can you honestly imagine the police telling people to take a different route to avoid a straight 'outdoor sports area'?

Wednesday, November 26, 2008 at 07:19AM | Registered CommenterDSD

It is too late. All the open/wooded spaces near me are continually cruised by homosexuals looking for others.

Wednesday, November 26, 2008 at 09:04AM | Unregistered CommenterJon Gregory

>>All the open/wooded spaces near me are continually cruised by homosexuals looking for others.<<

Good grief, how many gays are there in your neighbourhood?

Funny that when it comes to granting gays equal rights, we hear that they are only a miniscule minority and not worth bothering about, but then when we go for a walk they are suddenly everywhere!

Wednesday, November 26, 2008 at 09:32AM | Unregistered CommenterNOEL CUNNINGHAM

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>