« IN THE WINDMILLS OF EU MIND... | Main | “I Don’t Answer to the State” »

HOW CAN YOU FIGHT WHAT YOU DO NOT SEE?

I listend to a government minister, Bill Rammell, drone on this morning about how universities could help deal with "Al Queda" inspired terrorism. This new formulation of words is designed to ensure that British Muslims don't feel victimised by the use of the words Islamic terrorism, apparently.

Mr Rammell further added that the extremist Hitz ur Tahrir group, which clearly supports Jihad, shouLDl not be banned. He sees it as no different to the BNP.

For good measure he refused to designate palestinian suicide bombers as terrorists.

OK - check out the attached rally by the Islamofacists in Hitz ur Tahrir and tell me if you think they are harmless. Our government lives in denial of the menace that unnitegrated Islam represents to our freedoms, and aided and abetted by the MSM, it seeks to sanitise the actions of suicide bombers and those who think them to be martyrs as they blow innocent men women and children to pieces.  

Posted on Tuesday, January 22, 2008 at 08:58AM by Registered CommenterDavid Vance in | Comments7 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (7)

David Vance -

Rammell is the MP for a neighbouring constitutency of mine. He often writes in the local rag and you can be in no doubt, this man is a supercharged moron.

His career before politics encompasses a whole range of activities from managing student unions, to managing other student unions.

Even so, the mendacity of this government never fails to amaze. Islamists are clear in their intent to overthrow the monarchy and institute their own regime. For this the appropriate response is to hang them. To equate this with the patriots of the BNP is plainly absurd.

LBC News this morning during the Nick Ferrari show stated that Rammell was actually promoting the idea of islamists lecturing in universities, in order "to better understand them". The BBC piece doesn't mention this, but then even if true it wouldn't.

Tuesday, January 22, 2008 at 09:36AM | Registered CommenterPete Moore

Nice to hear someone else had to put up with Rammell and the tame muslim spouting their idiocy. I wouldn't say i was a supporter of the BNP but at the moment they appear to be the only party talking any sense about islamic terrorism. haven't noticed them blow anyone up recently either.

Tuesday, January 22, 2008 at 09:37AM | Unregistered Commenterfrakked

"Our government lives in denial of the menace that unnitegrated Islam represents to our freedoms, and aided and abetted by the MSM"

No it doesn't. But then again the only world leader making any real noise about the issue was Tony Blair. You wanted rid of him and we got Gordon. You reap what you sow!

Tuesday, January 22, 2008 at 12:46PM | Unregistered Commenteralison

Alison.

Well, apart from my odd spelling of the word unintegrated (!) I have to take issue with you.

I want rid of Labour, the parasitic vermin in charge. I have praised Blair for standing my Bush, and in all fairness, I have damned Brown since he came to power so I cannot be accused of in any way "wishing for him"

Next, I don't think ANY of the UK political parties get it. They are all dhimmified to varying degrees.Islam will come again for us, it will take more lives, and the immediate reaction of our elite will be to apologise to Islamists lest we get a tad upset.

Finally, the bit that REALLY annoyed me was the refusal of this Labour idiot to recognise that Pali suicide bombers ARE terrorists!

Tuesday, January 22, 2008 at 01:04PM | Unregistered CommenterDavid Vance

You need wind to make them work? And if it is the `wrong' kind of wind they have to be shut down. Like lots of things, it sounds good till you put it into practice..

Tuesday, January 22, 2008 at 01:16PM | Unregistered Commentercoaldust

David

The most important thing in this last decade was to stand by America in its hour of need. It went from being a mighy nation to quite a frightening state of affairs in the blink of an eye.

Whilst the world stood by and said Up Yours USA, he went out on a limb against the wishes of both his own government and HM Opposition and convinced everyone that we needed to be in Iraq, rightly or wrongly. But to stand by America at that point was important. We risked and lost British lives as a result (not that they really even care, the Americans, as demonstrated by the vitriol and sneering that poured forth over the Iran incident where we garnered more criticism than France or Europe ever took over its NATO failures) but you know what i'm saying.

He stood firm over our commitment to Afghanistan and repeatedly spoke up about radical Islam. He put forward a series of measures to counter terror which were shouted down everywhere as indicative of what's to come on civil rights for everyone (raises eyes to heaven, jeez what crap).

He is one guy. I think he despised his Cabinet. But successive governments have done little to stand up to these gangster styled religious thugs. It's the same the world over however. In getting rid of Blair - and it was Iraq and standing by America that killed him off - we have lost one Statesman who spoke up on the issue consistently. What have we heard from Gordon? Bugger all. Yes we have domestic issues with New Labour but they were elected and that's life - was it really worth having Gordon come in instead?

It isn't just Britain that is 'dhimmified' a word which no doubt gives succour to our enemies every time it is trotted out - it is EVERY nation in the West at varying degrees. Whether we like it or not this is a battle for hearts and minds.

We have noone and i mean noone -in the UK or the US- who looks anything like a statesman able to steer us through these issues that islamist terrorists will think twice about messing with.

To me that commitment we made and the lives we risked and lost is a huge huge deal. And to have stood up and argued that consistently as he did made him a keeper in my view - for as long as we have to live with Labour.

Tuesday, January 22, 2008 at 01:46PM | Unregistered Commenteralison

What exactly is the 'threat' from the BNP? How are each of the contributors threatened?

Tuesday, January 22, 2008 at 08:29PM | Unregistered CommenterAllan@Oslo

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>