« engage | Main | IN AT THE DEEP END....AGAIN! »

I Didn't Leave The Conservative Party, The Conservative Party Left Me...

...and started glugging down the Kool-Aid like there was no tomorrow.

Yes, every time I get those nagging little worries about whether or not we shouldnt in fact be going down the 'anything but Labour' route, you can be sure good old Mr Cameron will pop up with yet another insane stunt to confirm my deeply held belief that Blu-Labour is even further to the Left than Gordon's morons and therefore should only run this country over my dead body. And his loyal pack of loony Left 'Nu-Conservatives' will be there in force in the comments to bay for the blood of anyone who is discinclined to applaud him. And Americans, those evil babykilling bastards. Seriously, if you are a 'Conservative' of any stripe and have any intention of identifying with the 'modern' Tory Party again, just scan through those comments from Cameron's faithful and wonder how on earth they have the nerve to refer to UKIP supporters as the 'swivel-eyed loons'.

This month's bit of hilarious 100mph speeding Leftwards is both the creation of the post of Shadow Minister for Community Cohesion and the appointment of a rabid Islamic fundamentalist whose only merit appears to be that she is both Muslim and female, which by the standards of the modern Tory Party is enough to make her worth top dollars. Sorry, filthy oil-and-baby's-blood-stained dollars.

Here's our latest Cameron babe on the election of Hamas in January last year:

"I think what’s happened in the Middle East with the election of Hamas is actually an opportunity and I think that’s the way we’ve got to see it. When groups that practice violence are suddenly propelled into power through a democratic process they get responsibility and responsibility can be a tremendously taming factor. And I think that Hamas, when it realizes that it wants a safe and stable and prosperous Palestine for its people, will realize that the way to deal with that is through dialogue and democracy and not through violence… I actually think that Hamas has been given a mandate and I think it will now hopefully adopt a responsible position because that is the only way.”

Uh-huh. Well I'm sure all the dead Jews and Palis thrown off the tops of buildings and executed in front of their families in Gaza recently are really pleased with how thats gone. But of course Sayeeda Warsi had form on this kind of appeasement before that, didnt she? Remember this beauty, delivered just a few days after 7/7?

"We must start engaging with, not agreeing with, the radical groups who we have said in the past are complete nutters," she said. We need to bring these groups into the fold of the democratic process. As long as we exclude them and don't hear them out, we will allow them to continue their hate. It may not achieve results immediately, but it may stop the immediate violence."

Ms Warsi says talks with representatives of Sinn Fein/IRA helped stem the violence in Northern Ireland.

But...but...arent the 'radical groups' tiny splinters of Islamic society, totally unrepresentative of the aims and aspirations of Britain's Muslims as a whole? Hmmm...

It gets better though. See, our Sayeeda has adopted the thoroughly Islamic custom of saying one thing in order to fool the enemy and another to your own side in order to gain advantage...

"A campaign leaflet issued last year when she stood for Dewsbury, and in which she is seen wearing a Western business suit, focused on mainstream Tory issues including Europe — “Sayeeda Warsi believes in putting Britain first”. In a second leaflet, in which she wears a shalwar kameez, her concerns are homosexuality, which Labour is accused of promoting, and the “illegal” war in Iraq, which she says “may lead to further military action in places such as Syria, Lebanon and Iran”.

She also made extravagant claims about anti-terrorism arrests which even Shamnesty International might blush at in an 'Asian' magazine, saying:

“If terrorism is the use of violence against civilians, then where does that leave us in Iraq? Let me give you some facts and figures. To date, 895 people have been arrested under the terror laws, 23 have been charged. So effectively 872 innocent people have been locked up for 14 days."

As the Times points out:

Yet Home Office figures reveal that 296 of the 895 people arrested under the Terrorism Act 2000 before September 2005 were charged, either under the Act or with offences including murder and the possession of firearms and explosives.

Yet on being asked about this (ahem) discrepancy dear Sayeeda's reply was pretty much what you'd expect from someone who already sees herself as one of the Elite even before ever being elected to a seat.

"I don’t believe that I have to justify everything I write, line by line and word by word."

Sure, who should have to justify inciting a Muslim audience by vastly inflating and distorting figures on anti-terrorism arrests in the UK? Not Call Me Dave's latest protege, that's for damn sure.

So remember folks. Say it with me now.

"I Didnt Leave The Conservative Party..." 

Posted on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 02:34PM by Registered CommenterDSD | Comments9 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (9)

. . . the conservative party left me :-)

Sorry, couldnt resist.

Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 03:36PM | Unregistered CommenterBNP member

damn you beat me to it - had one all written up on her!

I loved this line

"It may not achieve results immediately*, but it may stop the immediate* violence."

wtf?

No this woman is a Tory through and through - she just knows how to be savvy with identity politics.

She believes in arranged marriages, no sex education (leave it to luck and an arranged marriage kinda girl), 'freedom' to wear the veil, religious upbringing, hates gays and is an old fashioned no nonsense la-di-daa right wing stuck-in-reverse gear Daily Mail Tory - they loved her! Her foreign affairs ramblings are all over the place as youve shown but doesnt change the basic facts. Tory!

Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 07:06PM | Unregistered Commenteralison

Plus she is also useless at arguing any case she believes in. I have seen her twice on Question time and she was as wet as dishwater.

Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 09:01PM | Unregistered Commentercolm

Yeah. She's useless - ideal for Cameron.

Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 12:16AM | Unregistered CommenterDavid Vance

Had a chat this evening with a friend who is a regional Tory honcho, and she wasn't actually sure who Warsi was. When I explained, she was horrified, as any sensible person would be, that this woman had been given a shadow cabinet position. But, of course, she won't countenance leaving the party.

What really frustrates me is that there are literally hundreds of thousands of decent people in the grassroots of the Tory party who are actively working to bring people like Warsi, who are completely opposed to what these grassroots activists themselves stand for, into government. If every Tory who thought that Cameron, Osbourne, Warsi, et al, were unfit to organise a Bacchanalia in a brewery next to a brothel left the party, then there would be very few members remaining. But, although they really know what is going on, they persist in this vain belief that everything will somehow turn out alright once they're in power. It's pathetic, really.

Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 01:27AM | Unregistered CommenterThe Fulham Reactionary

' No this woman is a Tory through and through - she just knows how to be savvy with identity politics.

She believes in arranged marriages,'

Er yeah, because the Tories are big supporters of arranged marriages....

Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 02:27AM | Unregistered CommenterRoss

Think about it Ross - full parental control, gets to decide who you can and cant go out with, no sex before marriage (plus google her views on arranged marriage that are billed in the Daily Mail like the second coming). An old fashioned Tory's idea of heaven.

Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 08:36AM | Unregistered Commenteralison

You gotta admit she has a point Ross - and witness Cameron's pathetic attempts to present the Party that presided over the biggest demographic break-up of marriages in British history as the new Party of the Family...

Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 09:39AM | Unregistered CommenterDSD

And FR, yes it is pathetic. This might amuse you a little.

http://dangerouslysubversivedad.blogspot.com/2006/09/how-to-answer-your-own-question-kinky.html

Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 09:47AM | Unregistered CommenterDSD

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>