Just a reminder that Tangled Wed Radio goes to air tomorrow evening at 8pm GMT.

As previously trailed, we're covering three topics; Political Correctness, The EU and the leaving thereof, and the Burqa - should we be banning Islamic garb in the UK.

Remember to make sure YOU have your say - PHONE IN to 001 646 652 2582. It costs a cent per minute.

If you prefer to just leave a comment, I'll be opening a thread before we go to air and I will read as many out as possible.

The strength of ATW is YOUR participation - so hit the dial tomorrow night and share your thoughts with the world. C'mon - I dare you.....!

Prince Charles might be attacking the fast food industry but the Pope has been asked to bless a sandwich.

Vatican officials have confirmed that KFC have asked for the Pope’s blessing on their new “Fish Snacker Sandwich” which, Kentucky believe, will be “ especially popular on Fridays”.

We live in an age that likes to appear cynical. It now seems naive to point out that the only thing that big business cares about is big bucks. And if you object that certain products demean girls and women, well, you are considered a prude. But it needs to be said, because simply saying 'So what?' is costing the childhood of a generation".  OK . Well said .  But frankly i dont see the harm a doll itself is.  The doll's clothing reflects what kids perceive as cool and hip as does the spin off merchandise kids clothing.  She should probably apply that thinking to the root of it all - the trash that is circulated by mass media in conveying what is cool and hip which is acceptable: 

Apparently its  'empowering'  for the likes of knickerless Britney and all the spin offs to hump the floor dressed as a schoolgirls.  I feel the same way about the female chauvinist pigs who perpertuate this myth and image as i do about their male counterparts who openly indulge it (thinking of some girating idiot on MTV holding his crotch and calling girls hoes, here, not the cabbie who calls me  'darlin' ..which is to twist Mikes expression would be PC gone bezerk).   What's with knickerless Britney, Paris Hilton and some dirty internet footage, Jordan and her boob jobs, Abbey Titmuss and Rebecca Loos celebrated as celebs for doing nothing more than shagging someone famous?  I am pretty fed up with Nuts, Zoo, Maxim, Loaded and a variety of soft porn boys magazines that set girls up on the cover like a couple of grinning bimbos (which the models themselves seem to buy into, unquestioningly, and babble on about being 'empowering')  sold as mass consumer 'pop'.   I dont think it makes me a prude.  Course you want to look cool, feel good about yourself and your image and a lot of what i would consider ok and fun might not be what others think is acceptable.   In the early 90s i dressed up in some tres raunchy clubbing numbers and had a blast.  As did my friends.   I dont think, maybe, we were so much influenced by something  because it wasnt mass culture. It was fun and it was unique.  Noone was dictating it to us and were old enough to know what we were wearing.  Trends are supposed to come and go though.  But one trend seems to be sticking.  Isnt it a worrying when its repackaged as 'empowering' and some 60% of little girls want to be glamour models or lap dancers? The result of that stat is a target market for unscrupulous business. Im just not sure where and how you draw the line?  And what about boys.  They are sexualised just as early. 

The first issue of Loaded had Gary Oldman on the cover and set out with good intentions (around about the same time i think as the Spice Girls and Girrrrl power). It didnt take them long to figure out what sells.  I just read that magazine sales of mens magazines are in decline in the UK as the shift moves to the internet (mag sales in the US of the same remain strong). New media that is as good as it is bad.  Two thirds of all internet searches are for porn - which gives you an idea of what is on the net and accessible unless you're vigilant.  Virtual sex games and their ads, trailers and free downloads could just as easily become a kids sex education.  You can say dont buy, switch off, ignore etc but in this day and age id wager that is becoming increasingly hard to do.  Whats to deflect it? Where's the balance with some 'better' role models that the media will buy into?

*as i was writing this the 23 year old uni student on work experience here took a look at this and agreed she feels the same way too. Phew!

A few days ago I mounted an article in which I outlined why I would not be voting DUP. Some of the comments it generated suggested that I should endorse another party or an independent anti-agreement candidate.

I respect the views of those who believe that one should always use their vote. But I am of the opinion that this election is not democratic.

The choice which people face in this election is, I feel, very much akin to that in Eastern Europe when it was dominated by the Soviets.

The people could vote but they could only vote for candidates from one party. The election result was predetermined before a single vote was cast.

On March 7^th the voters have a “choice” between four main parties all of whom advocate the same government – a coalition in which all of them will have places as of right.

On the other hand, I could vote Alliance who would like to be part of the aforementioned government but won’t get enough votes to secure an executive position.

In what other country would a preparation for government committee meet long before an election is even called?

Where else in the world could all the main parties be sure that they would have a place at the cabinet table given any conceivable result?

Our forefathers didn’t die in two world wars for this.

They died to prevent those who used violence to impose their will upon free peoples from achieving political power.

This election, on the other hand, has only been called because the Prime Minister is “convinced” that all the main political parties in Northern Ireland are prepared to share power with those who killed and maimed in order to further their objectives.

Why don’t I vote for the anti-agreement candidates?

Well, as we all know there is no such thing as an anti-agreement DUP candidate. All “Democratic” Unionists standing in this election have signed a resignation letter which can be triggered as and when the leadership sees fit.

On the other hand, I could vote for one of the half dozen Bob McCartneys.

The fact that Mr McCartney is running in so many constituencies detracts from the very serious points which he is making about the Belfast/St Andrews Agreement.

Mr McCartney is saying many things with which I wholeheartedly agree but he has allowed himself to become the butt of jokes by standing in so many constituencies.

The parallels with Rainbow George are inescapable.

So I’m not going to vote in this election – it’s an affront to democracy.

One of the BIGGEST LIES in current Northern Ireland politics is that "the constitutional position is settled."

Both the DUP and UUP like to pretend this - and openly declare so in their election literature. But they are either fools or knaves to suggest this and here is a little light on the subject.

The UK MSM wants John McCain as the GOP Presidential candidate next year. Of course they would prefer it if a Democrat wins the race for the White House - Hillary or Obama will do nicely -but McCain is their fall-back candidate. Why? Because he is on the far-liberal side of the Republican Party.

So imagine their consternation at the news that Rudy Giuliani, the former Mayor of New York, is opening a lead of up to 20 per cent over his declared rivals among likely Republican primary voters.

Naturally the UK MSM choose to portray this as "causing consternation on the right " of the GOP - pretending that "Right-wing"supporters are shocked  - yes, shocked -that the more socially liberal Giuliani is doing so well. Rubbish. It's the UK MSM which is shocked.

If issues like gay-marriage and abortion were the primary issues facing the US then they might have a point - but we are AT WAR with militant Islam and we need a President who is very clear on THIS central point and who can show REAL LEADERSHIP on the issue. I believe this is Rudy's BIG strength - it is why I shall support him - and it is why I believe he can win the White House next year. We need a leader - not a follower of shallow defeatist MSM liberal values.

As you have probably gathered by now, I don’t think much of the main Unionist political parties.

However, William McCrea’s statement on Sinn Fein/IRA and criminality in my view deserves to be both highlighted and commended.

Dr McCrea asked Mitchell McLaughlin if he still believed that the murder of Jean McConville was not a crime.

Mrs McConville, a mother of ten young children, was abducted by the IRA in 1972 because she helped comfort a dying soldier who had been shot just outside her front door.

Her body was not uncovered until 2003.

Just two years ago, McLaughlin told RTE that while the murder was “wrong” it was not a “crime”.

Surely Dr McCrea’s statement demands an answer.

If Sinn Fein/IRA still hold this warped view of what constitutes criminality then surely their claimed support for the rule of law is, as Dr McCrea puts it, “a nonsense”.

Well now - looks like the "pragmatists" are being given the upper hand in the Bush administration these days. I read that the United States announced yesterday that it would participate at an “ice-breaker” regional conference in Baghdad alongside Syria and Iran — both pariah states with whom President Bush refuses to have direct talks.

Although officials confirmed that the US was ready to attend the conference on the future of Iraq next month, there was confusion last night about whether it would sit down around a negotiating table with Syrian and Iranian diplomats. 

Sean McCormack, the State Department spokesman, did not rule out bilateral contact, saying:

“We’ll see. The focus is on Iraq. The Iraqi Government is convening the meeting. We look forward to attending it. At this point I’m not going to try to predict what direction the discussions might take, the interactions might take.”

The US idea that Iran and Syria will bring stability to the region is surreal and it strikes me that the Bush regime has entirely lost the Middle East plot. Condi may be in the ascendancy but the Bush doctrine lies in tatters. We are now with those who are against us. Wonderful.

The idea that schools should select pupils based on academic criteria is unacceptable to liberals. It's so unfair. It's discriminatory, they moan.

So what do they come up with as an alternative? That's right - a lottery to gain entry to school.

Places at some popular secondary schools in Brighton are to be allocated by lottery - the first time a council has backed such a change. The move by the Labour-run local authority comes as 200,000 children may miss out on their preferred school this year. Brighton and Hove says the new system will give more children a better chance of getting into popular schools.

Government is completely destroying education. It has removed academic ability as the criteria for entry. It has then dumbed down the curriculum. It has then indulged the radical egalitarians by insisting all kids are equal and all must have prizes. And now it ensures that a child can only get to a given school by lottery.

Is this an example of what George Orwell described, in his bleak masterpiece of literature "1984", as "doublethink"? -No, not quite, but it's something similar, I feel sure. "Doublethink" meant the ability to simultaneously hold and accept two opposing points of view, such as "the stars are little bits of fire a few kilometres away", and "the stars are huge suns, billions of miles distant". To say one thing for one purpose, then to immediately state the other thing for another purpose, and to eliminate from your mind the very fact that you had even contradicted yourself. No, this is not quite the same thing, but it is related. What I am looking for in this instance is a "Newspeak" word which means "to completely agree with a statement, yet simultaneously to completely disagree with it".

What in the name of jumping blue blazes am I babbling on about this time?  OK, I'll come directly to the point: I'm on about THIS news report, and more specifically, my reaction to the words of an official who was asked to comment on the situation.

The substance of the story: 

Rioting has broken out at a young offenders' institute in County Durham for the second time in three days.
A wing at Deerbolt, near Barnard Castle, was taken over by inmates on Tuesday evening, a spokesman for the Prison Officers' Association said.
Another wing was destroyed by about 40 inmates on Sunday. Four prison officers were injured in the eight-hour riot.

...and the words of the official, which have produced this strange "doublethink-esque" reaction in me: 

Steve Cox, national vice chair of the Prison Officers Association, said: "The fact that there have been two serious disturbances in the space of 48 hours has got to indicate that there is something drastically wrong in that institution." [....] "There has got to be something seriously wrong to cause prisoners to act in that way."

There's the thing that is bothering me. Yes, I absolutely and wholeheartedly agree with Mr Cox that "there is something drastically [and seriously] wrong in that institution, to cause prisoners to act in that way." I'm struggling with this intellectual paradox.  Because, you see, even though I could have used the exact same words myself, something bothers me. I don't know, call it a hunch, but somehow I "feel it in my bones" that when Mr Cox refers to "something [being] seriously wrong", he actually means something completely different to what I would mean, if I said the same words. Hence Mr Cox and I find ourselves in total agreement, yet at the same time in total disagreement. Isn't language a funny thing?

(PS, if you're still at a loss as to what I mean by all this, then try deleting Mr Cox's word "cause" from his above quote, and replacing it with the word "allow", and the mists might begin to clear).

But it's about more than that. It's about CHOICE! People should be allowed to eat what they want. where they want - and IF McDonald's can attract people with well-priced tasty food, I say good on them. Prince Charles view on fast food is snobbish and removed from reality. There's nothing wrong with McDonalds food. Maybe we should ban Prince Charles from talking through his backside.

Only a few weeks after the atrocious shootings in south London, the terror that is increasingly part of the fabric of everyday society finds itself almost on my doorstep.  Yesterday morning a 20-year old student was shot in the head at Brackenhill Park, Horton Bank in Bradford.  He is criticially ill in hospital.  As I drove past the scene today, the park was awash with police officers and accompanying journalists.

If anything this incident has brought it home to me that the terror of gun crime in our country is not solely a phenomenon of inner city ghettos.  Brackenhill Park lies off Hollingwood Lane in the west of the city; a pleasant suburban part of Bradford with many new housing developments and a good standard of living.  It is not the Bradford of the Muslim riots back in 2001.  Nor is it anything like the streets of south London where Cox et al met their deaths.  If an attempted brutal shooting can occur in Brackenhill Park, then no part of Bradford (or any city of reasonable size) is safe.

Police have given a description of two men who fled the scene of the shooting.  They are described as 'Asian males' and, judging by the name of the victim, their intended target was also 'Asian'.  When are the police and the politicians going to have the guts to say what the rest of us already know: that violent methods of crime in the UK have increased exponentially since the advent of mass immigration and sizeable ethnic communities.  This isn't to say that every single ethnic minority is a criminal.  Far from it!  What such an admission would do is to encourage the law-abiding elements of those communities to start a bit of introspective analysis instead of hiding behind a flag of politically correct convenience and racial sensitivities..

Updated on Friday, March 2, 2007 at 11:17AM by Mr Smith

On January 22nd, 2007, something new happened. Following closely on the tails of the Unknown Documentary on the Jihadi preaching, we had been buried in the slurry of Big Brother and the predictable hysteria of 'racism' in the UK. Having thus gained yet another reason to avoid the noxious MainStream Media (MSM) I did my usual rounds of my favourite blogs and noticed that the ever-excellent Gates of Vienna (GoV) was carrying an article by 'a British reader' on the recent occurrences. The Week Britain Died, by Paul Weston, became one of several posted on GoV, closely followed by Britain's Dystopian Schoolchildren (commenting on the erosion of social ability in children) and Questioning the Sanity of Liberals (commenting on, well, the insanity of liberals).

 All very excellent pieces and must-read articles. But one thing lacked. A native audience. Some few emails later, Mr Weston and I have agreed that as long as he keeps writing these high-quality articles, I get to keep posting them for your education here on ATW, a very British blog if ever there was one. So please scroll on down to read the latest article by Paul Weston, on Multiculturalism and it's uses.

Multiculturalism – Merits and Debits

Until very recently British politicians and journalists were forever eulogizing on the merits of a multicultural society. They told us how enriching it was, how we should celebrate our vibrant diversity hitherto unavailable in the racially stale and homogenous West. However, despite these outpourings of praise verging on the messianic I have yet to hear any of them elaborate on the concrete positives of multiculturalism. Just one instance would suffice but multiculturalism’s adherents prefer to praise in the general rather than the specific. As such they are just words with no meaning and no intention of meaning, other perhaps than that of deliberate subterfuge. 

Click to read more ...

Members of the 3 Para Battle Group, which included troops from 3rd Battalion the Parachute Regiment, 51 Para Squadron, Royal Engineers, Royal Irish Regiment and D Squadron Household Cavalry, taking part in Operation Baghi in July 2006. The operation took place in the town of Sangin, in the north of Helmand Province.

The mission saw troops from 51 Para Sqn RE complete an operational engineering first, as they built an Air Portable Ferry Bridge across the River Helmand. Troops flew in to Sangin at first light and cleared a safe route in to the district centre, to allow re-supply and bridging vehicles to enter. They were assisted with artillery provided by 7th Battalion RHA and attack helicopters from 9 Regiment AAC. Both were used extensively throughout the operation. This image was taken on Operation Herrick IV, the UK's deployment into Helmand Province of Southern Afghanistan. The op has seen the development of the Helmand Task Force in the province, which has seen the cross Governmental Provincial Reconstruction Team set up in Lashkah Gar, to help the Afghan Government build strong governmental institutions, security and create jobs.

HMS St Alban's sea boats get ready to pick up the Royal Marine boarding team, for the last boarding of the evening. HMS St Albans, a Type 23 Frigate, sailed from Portsmouth on a 6-month deployment to the Gulf Region. On route she paid goodwill visits to a number of countries in the Mediterranean and Black Sea including, Algeria, Albania, Greece, Ukraine, Romania and Bulgaria. Arriving in the Gulf in early April, HMS St Albans is currently stationed a few miles off Iraq, patrolling with other coalition warships as well as patrol boats from the Iraqi Navy. Their focus now is the protection of Iraqi oil platforms, which are vital in ensuring oil exports continue to flow. This, in turn, means that money is generated towards rebuilding Iraq, as the country moves to become self-sufficient once more.  

Yup. Totally gratuitous, I know. All worth it though eh ladies? Back me up here. We've had a few Girls Aloud piccies. These guys are far more worthy!! 

After checking through David's little essay on our muscular Councils, and their proclivity to poke their noses in where they are not welcome, I e-mailed about nineteen Caradon Councillors to establish if they were prepared to defend the staements and actions of their Head of Environmental Services! Got a couple of anodyne replies, but the real treasure lay deep in the reply received from the man himself, Mike Bullock.

He defends his words, issued as a sharp reminder to a publican whose only desire was to allow a few pensioners access to his 'soup and roast lunch' by means of a free ride in his car, by virtue of the fact that the publican wasn't licensed as a taxidriver, while stating "I would add that we have not prosecuted the landlord, merely advised him of the legal situation and suggested alternative ways of continuing the service in question!", and  "Neither would it be very fair on all the licensed private hire operators in our area who diligently submit their vehicles for annual safety checks and whose drivers go through a test and a criminal record check to ensure the safety and security of vulnerable passengers."

So, there we have it, he's not so much worried by the landlord's activities as he is against possible hidden and subversive competion against all the licensed taxi firms in the area!

LOL - did you see this item?

Al Gore’s global-warming documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, has collected an Oscar for best documentary feature, and ATW paid its' own tribute to the great one yesterday. But now  the Tennessee Center for Policy Research has found that Gore deserves a gold statue for hypocrisy too!

Gore’s mansion, [20-room, eight-bathroom] located in the posh Belle Meade area of Nashville, consumes more electricity every month than the average American household uses in an entire year, according to the Nashville Electric Service (NES).  In his documentary, the former Vice President calls on Americans to conserve energy by reducing electricity consumption at home. The average household in America consumes 10,656 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year, according to the Department of Energy. In 2006, Gore devoured nearly 221,000 kWh—more than 20 times the national average.

Last August alone, Gore burned through 22,619 kWh—guzzling more than twice the electricity in one month than an average American family uses in an entire year. As a result of his energy consumption, Gore’s average monthly electric bill topped $1,359. 

It gets worse!!! Since the release of "An Inconvenient Truth", Gore’s energy consumption has INCREASED from an average of 16,200 kWh per month in 2005, to 18,400 kWh per month in 2006.  Gore’s extravagant energy use does not stop at his electric bill. Natural gas bills for Gore’s mansion and guest house averaged $1,080 per month last year.

This is typical of the Green Crusaders. They fly - first class - around the world lecturing us all on our lifestyles whilst they themselves are two-faced hypocrites. Betcha the the MSM will keep quiet on this one!

Mayor Red Ken Livingstone is a serious threat to the future of London. I see that today he has announced he aims to cut the capital's carbon emissions by 60 per cent by 2025 - twice as fast as government targets - through:

* An immediate increase in the cost of air travel to reflect its environmental damage.

* Neighbourhood power stations to prevent energy waste during transfer from the National Grid.

* Use of solar and wind power, and possibly wave power from the Thames.

* Getting Londoners to ditch their cars and travel to work by bike or public transport.

This man will crucify the commercial heart of our country. His plan is to tax, tax, and then tax some more. He'll persecute the private motorist, he'll pummel the independent air-traveller. He will harass big business. When will he be voted out? Leaving him in power makes me think Londonders are already very green.

Well, you learn something new every day! I assumed (fatal mistake) that incest was against the law with good reason everywhere. Not so.

This is revealed in the news that a German brother and sister are challenging the law against incest so that they can continue their relationship free from the threat of imprisonment. Their supporters say they will fight until incest is no longer regarded as a criminal offence, arguing that the law is out of date. They say it harks back to the racial hygiene laws of the Third Reich and should be overturned in favour of freedom of choice and sexual determination.

Incest is not illegal in many of Germany's neighbouring countries. Napoleon abolished France's incest laws in 1810. Neither is it a crime in the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Belgium, Portugal or Turkey. Japan, Argentina and Brazil have also legalised it in recent years. Incest is forbidden in Britain, where the law was extended in 2002 to include not just those with blood ties, but also step-parents and their children and in cases of adoptions.

How long before the "legalise incest" lobby starts making in-roads in the UK - in the name of equality of course?

I was interested in the news today that suggest that more than 1.7 million people in the UK will have dementia by 2051, costing billions of pounds each year, experts have forecast. The grim projections are based on the most up-to-date evaluation of dementia. Currently 700,000 - or one person in every 88 in the UK - has dementia, incurring a yearly cost of £17bn.

My mother suffers from this illness and I can assure you that the level of assistance from the State is minimal, fragmented and inefficient. In fact my mother is lucky insofar as she has actually been able to get some of the drugs that slow down the advance of the disease - but she forgets to take them. Many others have to wait until the mental deterioration is advanced before medication is proscribed. It's a terrible, frustrating affliction - and many many families are having to cope with it because Government is unable to deal with the consequences.

So what do you make of this story?

For some of the village's elderly residents, it was to be the highlight of the week. Ten took up pub landlord Ali Yeoman's offer of a discounted two-course lunch for pensioners every Wednesday, with a lift to the Bullers Arms thrown in free of charge. The promotion was a godsend to those finding it difficult to get about, some of whom might otherwise be stuck indoors all week. Then the local council got to hear about it. After the first of the get-togethers, Mr Yeoman fell foul of council officials who banned him from giving lifts because he does not have a taxi licence. The landlord received a letter warning him to withdraw the service when he advertised it in his local paper. Officials said he was effectively running a taxi service and would require a private hire licence.

So now the elderly residents in the village don't get their weekly discounted lunch and the Council little Hitlers are happy. Sickening.