DV TWITTERING

RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
THE PRICE OF REWARDING TERRORISM

You do not defeat terrorism by rewarding terrorists, regardless of how many bleeding heart liberals argue otherwise. Want to know where that flawed approach leads to? Read UNIONISM DECAYED 1997-2007 - It's my first book and it explains what happens when you seeek to appease terrorists and call it peace. It's available right now for ATW readers so make sure you get your copy by emailing the editor! This is the book that dissents from the herd mentality that doing wrong can lead to being right. It doesn't and this book spells out WHY.

HIT THE TIP JAR!
More About This Website

 

THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT

We'd really like to have you comment on our site! We want good conversation, no abuse and no trolls. I reserve the right to ban anybody who wilfully and persistently breaks these rules. So go ahead and speak your mind!

Can America Trust the BBC?


"I do remember... the corridors of Broadcasting House were strewn with empty champagne bottles. I'll always remember that", Jane Garvey, BBC Five Live, May 10th, 2007, recalling May 2nd, 1997.

Login
Powered by Squarespace
Powered by Squarespace
SEARCH ATW
SITEMETER

« BEWARE - MILK! | Main | HOSPITAL COVER.. »
Monday
12Jan2009

NO REASON TO VOTE CONSERVATIVE..

I see that David Cameron, the Conservative leader, has warned that a Tory government would not introduce tax cuts during the recession. Admitting that his words would disappoint many within the party, Mr Cameron insisted that the economic circumstances were not right for tax cuts in the immediate future, and said that his focus as prime minister would be on restoring confidence.

Fine. So, in principle, there will be no substantive difference between a future Conservative government and the current Labour government. They are both intent to tax us as much as they can. Why bother voting Conservative when you get the same policies as Labour? ONLY tax-cuts, and a reduction in the scale and cost of the State, will help us restore prosperity and Cameron seems determined to do neither. Big mistake.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (9)

I have been stating on here, for as long as I have been commenting, that there are no differences of substance between Cameron's cons and Nulab: they are one and the same, and this isn't by chance. Every single institution of this country is headed by somebody whose views can simply be described as PC, be it the police, local authorities, 'mainstream' political parties, mass media, religious bodies - all PC. PC's intended outcome is the elimination of the nation as a source of sovereign power and, most egregious of all, the destruction of the British people.
David Cameron is PC: David Davis is/was not so Davis had to be stopped and he was. That is when I switched to the BNP and I'm being proven correct by events.

Monday, January 12, 2009 at 10:49AM | Registered Commenterallan@aberdeen

Glad to see that I'm not the only BNP supporter on here.Surely everyone with an ounce of sense knows that the three main parties are a Lib/Lab/Con axis of deceit,all rabidly pro- "Europe" and eager to give away what remains of this poor country to the unelected crooks of Brussels.The Long March through the institutions by the Marxist Frankfurt School is almost complete.

Monday, January 12, 2009 at 11:45AM | Unregistered CommenterE Jones

"Glad to see that I'm not the only BNP supporter on here."

You just noticed now?

Monday, January 12, 2009 at 12:42PM | Unregistered CommenterJimmy Sands

Allan@Aberdeen: "I have been stating on here, for as long as I have been commenting, that there are no differences of substance between Cameron's cons and Nulab:"

You don't like Cameron because his conservative party is too much like the Labour party (I don't disagree, by the way).

How do the economic policies of the BNP differ from the economic policies of the Tories?

Monday, January 12, 2009 at 02:16PM | Unregistered CommenterAPL

>>That is when I switched to the BNP and I'm being proven correct by events.<<

Allan.

As an Aberdonian why don't you give your own nationalist party a go? Or are they too kind to non-whites for you?

Monday, January 12, 2009 at 02:27PM | Unregistered CommenterTony

The Labour Party is catching on to the terrible idea that the White Working Class is drifting away from Labour, mainly because of the immigration and housing scams perpetuated by who else but the same Labour Party. They see council housing, up for 'auction bids' according to the law disappearing into Polish, Kurdish, Afghani or Pakistani occupation because the rules,, which used to be fair, have been twisted and warped by NULabour.

They also see this sort of thing, which brings the whole idea of suitable dwellings into disrepute.

The blessed Hazel Blears, in her published warnings to the Party, never ever mentioned the name of the BNP, saying only the regulation mantra of 'Right Wing extremists' to identify the opposition!

IF the BNP ever got set up in my area, I might well have a look, because as many have stated, the others speak with the same forked tongue!

Monday, January 12, 2009 at 04:24PM | Registered CommenterMike Cunningham

"IF the BNP ever got set up in my area, I might well have a look,"

Dear God, if they can't get your vote what chance do they have?

Monday, January 12, 2009 at 04:29PM | Unregistered CommenterJimmy Sands

LOL, Jimmy.

Monday, January 12, 2009 at 04:39PM | Unregistered CommenterNOEL CUNNINGHAM

Since Alan has not replied, I thought I would mosey (ha!) on over to the BNP web site to see what their economic policies actually are:

"Globalisation, with its export of jobs to the Third World, is bringing ruin and unemployment to British industries ..."

Could be straight out of the Socialist workers handbook.

"Accordingly, the BNP calls for the selective exclusion of foreign-made goods .. "

Protectionism, pretty much Labour policy until Blair took over.

"When this is done, unemployment in this country will be brought to an end,"

Ah! yes, the Labour mantra of 'full employment'.

"We further believe that British industry, commerce, land and other economic and natural assets belong in the final analysis to the British nation and people."

Oh! Nationalization, another throwback to the old Labour party.

"We will take active steps to break up the socially, economically and politically damaging monopolies now being established by the supermarket giants."

Command economy, another socialist policy. And by the way, most of these policies are writ large on the EU stage too.

Monday, January 12, 2009 at 07:45PM | Unregistered CommenterAPL

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>