« FOOTSTEPS ON THE CEILING! | Main | MR BROON AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL GENOCIDE! »

ON NO - IT'S SWEDEN VS THE PROPHET AGAIN!

muh-hund-aiklit.jpgWould you believe it? Sweden's embassy in Pakistan has expressed "regret" over the publication of a cartoon depicting the Prophet Muhammad in a Swedish newspaper. Pakistan had complained about the cartoon, which depicted the head of the Prophet on the body of a dog. Sweden's government said it regretted any hurt but could not apologise as it was not responsible for the drawing and could not prevent its publication. The new drawing depicting the Prophet's head on the body of a dog was published in the Swedish newspaper Nerikes Allehanda on Sunday. The cartoon's creator, Lars Vilks, told the Associated Press news agency the drawing was art. "I'm not against Islam. Everybody knows that," he is quoted as saying. (on his way to his studio somewhere in Outer Mongolia, I'm reckoning)

I don't understand why the artist decided to graft the head of Mohammad onto a dog but I can see that this could be taken as offensive, and not just to dog-owners! ut unless we are going to censor everything - something which I am sure Pakistan would probably approve of - then I'm afraid Muslims are going to have to learn a little tolerance. 

Posted on Friday, August 31, 2007 at 02:18PM by Registered CommenterDavid Vance in | Comments19 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (19)

I thought the British-American humor divide was large enough. Can someone explain the humor in the cartoon? It looks like a bad drawing by an untalented eight year old child. Perhaps the caption is missing?

Friday, August 31, 2007 at 03:03PM | Unregistered Commentermahons


>>Perhaps the caption is missing?<<

How about: Mahommad's latest hat-trick!

Friday, August 31, 2007 at 03:21PM | Unregistered CommenterNOEL CUNNINGHAM

It looks like rubbish to me - more to be pitied!

Friday, August 31, 2007 at 03:22PM | Registered CommenterDavid Vance

Hat tip Harrys Place covering this same story:

"Meanwhile, the Washington Post pulled an irreverent and long running cartoon strip, because it poked fun at the notion of a faddish political activist adopting Islamist politics:

This is Fox News on the background:


The Washington Post Writers Group syndicates "Opus," and the Post is the cartoon's home newspaper. The syndicate sent out an alert about the two strips in question, according to Writers Group comics editor Amy Lago.

Sources told FOXNews.com that the strips were shown to Muslim staffers at The Washington Post to gauge their reaction, and they responded "emotionally" to the depiction of a woman dressed in traditional Muslim garb and espousing conservative Islamic views.

There was also considerable alarm over the strip at the highest echelons of The Washington Post Co., according to the sources.

Lago said she flagged some of the syndicate's newspaper clients for two reasons: because of the possibility that the jokes about Islam would be misconstrued and because of the sexual innuendo in the punchline.

"The strip came in and I knew we would have to send out an alert to all the newspapers," Lago said. "I do that fairly regularly with materials that might pose issues for local areas. ... We knew that because it was a sex joke, it could raise issues. And there is another client that has issues with any Muslim depiction whatsoever."

Friday, August 31, 2007 at 03:36PM | Unregistered Commenteralison

Noel - good one and good idea, we should have a Mike Cunningham style competition to determine the winning caption. I'll offer "Worst in the Show" as my entry.

Friday, August 31, 2007 at 04:02PM | Unregistered Commentermahons

I'm assuming putting Muhammad's head on a dog is supposed to be a reference to his - and Islam's in general's - dislike of dogs because they are "unclean". It is no doubt provocative and even offensive.

But that's all part of free speech. Muslims need to learn to live with it, instead of descending into fits of murderous rage whenever such cartoons are drawn. The Swedish embassy is playing the dhimmi game - not good.

Friday, August 31, 2007 at 04:18PM | Unregistered CommenterBen

LA GALAXY'S NEW SIGNING?

Friday, August 31, 2007 at 07:00PM | Unregistered CommenterDavid Vance

David

I'm not sure about the "again" in the title of the post. It was Denmark the last time. But in any case, they should not have expressed regret.

The Danish cartoons are here

Friday, August 31, 2007 at 07:05PM | Registered CommenterPeter

yep, muslims is once again showing their tolerance, love of peace, compassion and great sense of proportion. how? oh of course, with burning walking on flags (ehh, anyone offended? yawn.) burning of dolls(islam or voodoo?) and the usual threat of death murder hell and destruction. I advise them to get a haricut/beard cut and a job. good luck you nice bunch, i wish i were friends with ya all!!! /love from sweden.

Friday, August 31, 2007 at 07:19PM | Unregistered CommenterMr. Andersson

That's the cartoon? I couldn't find it. Damn, that man couldn't draw his way out of a wet paper bag.

I wouldn't read too much into the embassy's apology. I gather that's what embassies are for.

Friday, August 31, 2007 at 09:25PM | Unregistered CommenterS. Weasel

The Prophet (Fleas be upon him)

Friday, August 31, 2007 at 09:53PM | Unregistered CommenterHenry94

Man, that's a lousy cartoon. They should have apologized for the quality of the artwork, it looks like a 10 year old drew it.

Is that Michael Vick's backyard?

Friday, August 31, 2007 at 10:05PM | Unregistered CommenterDaphne

Good one Henry

I can't seem to find anywhere what the message of the cartoon was meant to be. I can understand the simplistic message of insulting Muslims by putting Mohameds head on a dog but wht is the meaning of the goal.

Friday, August 31, 2007 at 10:10PM | Unregistered Commentercolm

the goal = according to muslim a jew a is a dog, god created man to be his image - a jew is a man, but a jew is a dog, -> the image of god is a man -> then god is a dog, and followingly muhammed is a dog

Friday, August 31, 2007 at 11:48PM | Unregistered Commenterexplenation?

Well that's as clear as mud.

Friday, August 31, 2007 at 11:52PM | Unregistered Commentercolm

in agreement with that statement colm.

Saturday, September 1, 2007 at 12:01AM | Unregistered CommenterDaphne

jew = dog (according to SOME muslims"
god created man to be his image
jew = man
jew = dog accorsding to above muslims
BUT
jew = man = gods image = dog (see above statements)
THEN
dog = god (since god created man as his image)
and followingly muhammed, beeing classified as a man, is a dog, since man = god = dog, according to above statements.

clear as mud.

Saturday, September 1, 2007 at 12:17AM | Unregistered Commenterclear as mud?

AAh I understand it now. Something about a Jewish dog thinking he's human but in actual fact turning out to be a Muslim god in the head but ordinary dog in the body. Do I win a prize ?

Saturday, September 1, 2007 at 12:23AM | Unregistered Commentercolm

GOD DAMN EVERY FOOLISH IDIOT THAT EVEN THINKS HE CAN INSULT PROPHET MUHAMED(peace upon him).
prophet muhamed is the greatest man ever god has created.because he is the messenger of ALLAH
ALLAH IS OUR ONLY GOD,OUR CREATOR WHO GAVE HIS BEST CREATORS(PROPHET MUHAMED) A MESSAGE TO US.....??IT IS THE HOLY QURAN
SO anyman who has insulted prophet muhamed will be punished two times once in our world and the most in hell.........SO AWARE NOT ONLY FROM MUSLEMS BUT THE MOST FROM ALLAH

Monday, September 17, 2007 at 03:13PM | Unregistered CommenterY.M.A PHD

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>