DV TWITTERING

RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
THE PRICE OF REWARDING TERRORISM

You do not defeat terrorism by rewarding terrorists, regardless of how many bleeding heart liberals argue otherwise. Want to know where that flawed approach leads to? Read UNIONISM DECAYED 1997-2007 - It's my first book and it explains what happens when you seeek to appease terrorists and call it peace. It's available right now for ATW readers so make sure you get your copy by emailing the editor! This is the book that dissents from the herd mentality that doing wrong can lead to being right. It doesn't and this book spells out WHY.

HIT THE TIP JAR!
More About This Website

 

THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT

We'd really like to have you comment on our site! We want good conversation, no abuse and no trolls. I reserve the right to ban anybody who wilfully and persistently breaks these rules. So go ahead and speak your mind!

Can America Trust the BBC?


"I do remember... the corridors of Broadcasting House were strewn with empty champagne bottles. I'll always remember that", Jane Garvey, BBC Five Live, May 10th, 2007, recalling May 2nd, 1997.

Login
Powered by Squarespace
Powered by Squarespace
SEARCH ATW
SITEMETER

« Joe Biden’s Gaffebalooza | Main | Welcome to the United Socialist States of America? »
Tuesday
23Sep2008

REALITY CONCERN...

I was pleased to read that the European court's top advisor on Tuesday has rejected a rights group's claim that British retirement law, under which the over-65s can be forced to stop working, breaks EU law.

Age Concern has challenged British law, which since 2006 has allowed employers to compel retirement after the age of 65. The rights group argues that setting an age limit is discriminatory as many people of pensionable age are still willing and able to work. On the whole, the answers that Advocate General Jan Mazak suggested to the court "support the arguments of the UK government and reject those of Age Concern," the Luxembourg-based European Court of Justice said in a statement. The advocate general's opinion, though not binding, is a major blow to Age Concern as the European courts normally follow his suggestions.

I do not dispute that there are people 65 years and over capable of quality work. But that is a mute point since it should be for an EMPLOYER to decide what age an employee must retire, not an advocacy group.  It is a sensible term of contract.If the law was changes to prevent employers setting a retirement age, then that is going to cause huge problems, add huge costs and generate huge friction as an ageing workforce demands to stay on.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (7)

Quite. Over-65s can still work for an employer willing to employ them, but Age Concern appears to believe that an employee can force an employer to continue employing them. That would be a restraint on the freedom to contract and give the employee a gross claim on the property of the employer.

Incidentally, we're quite capable of settling these matters ourselves. We don't need foreigners arbitrating on our behalf.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 08:38PM | Unregistered CommenterPete Moore

Pete, you'd make a good American.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 08:47PM | Unregistered CommenterCharles in texas

Praise indeed. But would I make a good Texan? That's a real benchmark ;)

Unfortunately I won't get the chance to find out. The US is apparently a nation of immigrants, but someone in DC has decided I'm not to be one of them.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 10:08PM | Unregistered CommenterPete Moore

Surely David will know who in Washington has been accessing ATW!

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 10:19PM | Unregistered CommenterNOEL CUNNINGHAM

Noel Cunningham -

Oh it's not my activities here. My free market, free speaking, small government, self responsible, God fearing creed puts me smack bang in the middle of true, patriotic American sentiment.

Then again, that could be a problem, since DC long ago put itself above American sentiment.

Nope, all Britons are in my position. None of us have any real chance of getting in. The last time I looked, Bolivians and Somalis had a way in while Britons were effectively told to naff off.

Yes, it is a reason why I have such a low opinion of American government.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 10:30PM | Unregistered CommenterPete Moore

Pete,

For $500,000 you can get a permanent green card. I have heard that even $250,000 will do the trick in some States. It has something to do with their equivalent of our Developement Areas programme, The visa is an E5...

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 10:40PM | Unregistered CommenterErnest Young

Ernest Young -

Interesting. I didn't know that my presence would be welcomed if I paid a small fortune to the government. Nothing like a principle eh, and this is nothing like a principle.

As soon as our government allows me to keep some money of my own I'll follow it up.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 10:45PM | Unregistered CommenterPete Moore

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>