DV TWITTERING

RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
THE PRICE OF REWARDING TERRORISM

You do not defeat terrorism by rewarding terrorists, regardless of how many bleeding heart liberals argue otherwise. Want to know where that flawed approach leads to? Read UNIONISM DECAYED 1997-2007 - It's my first book and it explains what happens when you seeek to appease terrorists and call it peace. It's available right now for ATW readers so make sure you get your copy by emailing the editor! This is the book that dissents from the herd mentality that doing wrong can lead to being right. It doesn't and this book spells out WHY.

HIT THE TIP JAR!
More About This Website

 

THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT

We'd really like to have you comment on our site! We want good conversation, no abuse and no trolls. I reserve the right to ban anybody who wilfully and persistently breaks these rules. So go ahead and speak your mind!

Can America Trust the BBC?


"I do remember... the corridors of Broadcasting House were strewn with empty champagne bottles. I'll always remember that", Jane Garvey, BBC Five Live, May 10th, 2007, recalling May 2nd, 1997.

Login
Powered by Squarespace
Powered by Squarespace
SEARCH ATW
SITEMETER

« British vs American Media | Main | THE WAR ON...PARK BENCHES! »
Sunday
03Jun2007

round two

Blair continues to show that he still gets it and outlines the issues that faced the government after implementing a Human Rights Act in a PRE 9/11 world and realising there is no such thing as absolute civil liberty.

Within the next few weeks we will publish new proposals on anti-terror laws. Our aim is to reach a consensus across the main political parties. But at the heart of these new proposals will lie the same debate: the balance between protecting the safety of the public and the rights of the individual suspected of being involved with terrorism

A departing message that sets up Brown who appears to be not such a soft follow on as I thought. How this is managed, or rather who railroads it, will help determine my vote in the next election. 

The Chancellor believes it is possible to win support for increasing the 28-day limit if there is stronger judicial oversight. Brown believes there is a need to extend detention because of the volume of international evidence which accrues in such investigations, most of which can be difficult to obtain from computers. And more importantly he schedules in a discussion on evidence which if the 28 day extension fails, is a major issue on the agenda.

Brown's decision to call for a Privy Council review on the use of telephone-tap evidence shows the Chancellor believes the traditional balancing act - whether it is right to produce in court irrefutable evidence of a terrorist conspiracy when that might expose other intelligence sources - has now come down in favour of presenting the evidence.

The success of one of these might cancel out the need for the other, which is why Im very happy to see them both on the agenda in what appears to be a more carefully thought through set of proposals.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (5)

Alison,

Yes, it is very interesting to see how this plays out. I have always agreed with you that Blair mostly gets it on the WOT, and if Brown can follow up that will be good. But the Labour Party itself, like the Tories, do NOT get it, the MSM does not get it, so how will things develop? Mmmm...

Sunday, June 3, 2007 at 11:35AM | Unregistered CommenterDavid Vance

Interesting to read what Brown said about getting his party's left wingers into line and about Hain. Even more interesting to see if the Tories side with Labours hard left as usual.

Sunday, June 3, 2007 at 11:39AM | Unregistered Commenteralison

Bet they will. To paraphrase Oscar Wilde, there is only one thing in the world worse than being a Labour politician, and that is being a Conservative one!!

Sunday, June 3, 2007 at 11:41AM | Unregistered CommenterDavid Vance

I think Mr Brown mightjust be the person we are all looking for. No pussyfooting around with hoodies wow. Careful David Cameron you are looking very shaky at the moment.

Sunday, June 3, 2007 at 10:01PM | Unregistered CommenterMaggie

Could ONE senior British politician of any main party please make a stand for liberal secularism in the face of multicultural political claptrap?

This would mean condemning the islamists for their open hatred of jews, women and democracy, as well as their covert or open espousal of jihad and suicide bombers.

No, I thought not.

Sunday, June 3, 2007 at 10:17PM | Registered CommenterPeter

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>