DV TWITTERING

RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
THE PRICE OF REWARDING TERRORISM

You do not defeat terrorism by rewarding terrorists, regardless of how many bleeding heart liberals argue otherwise. Want to know where that flawed approach leads to? Read UNIONISM DECAYED 1997-2007 - It's my first book and it explains what happens when you seeek to appease terrorists and call it peace. It's available right now for ATW readers so make sure you get your copy by emailing the editor! This is the book that dissents from the herd mentality that doing wrong can lead to being right. It doesn't and this book spells out WHY.

HIT THE TIP JAR!
More About This Website

 

THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT

We'd really like to have you comment on our site! We want good conversation, no abuse and no trolls. I reserve the right to ban anybody who wilfully and persistently breaks these rules. So go ahead and speak your mind!

Can America Trust the BBC?


"I do remember... the corridors of Broadcasting House were strewn with empty champagne bottles. I'll always remember that", Jane Garvey, BBC Five Live, May 10th, 2007, recalling May 2nd, 1997.

Login
Powered by Squarespace
Powered by Squarespace
SEARCH ATW
SITEMETER

« ON THE WAY OUT... | Main | Does Michael Ramirez Get it Right? »
Thursday
05Nov2009

SEX EDUCATION FOR ALL!

Wonder what you make of the news that parents are to be forced to allow their children to have sex education before the age of consent? 

Under the new laws, when children reach 15 their parents will lose the right to withdraw them from sex education. At present parents can remove their children from lessons about sex until they are 19.

But our wise rulers, who know so much more than any parent, will now ensure that sex education is FORCED upon our kids. Totalitarian swine.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (11)

David -

That's just a part of it. That wicked pervert Ed Balls is back yet again with more instructions to more State goons to talk about sex and self gratification to little boys and girls:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/6507537/Sex-and-drug-lessons-from-age-5.html

Under the new curriculum, pupils as young as seven will learn about puberty and the facts of life and five-year-olds will be taught about parts of the body, relationships and the effects of drugs on the body.

Once they reach secondary school, pupils will learn about contraception, HIV and Aids, pregnancy and different kinds of relationships - including same sex unions and civil partnerships.

Truly, we are governed by sick people.

Thursday, November 5, 2009 at 04:54PM | Registered CommenterPete Moore

David this is more widespread than you indicate. When I was in biology class at grammar school, as well as the human reproductive system I was also forced to learn about the human cardiovascular system and the respiratory system as well.

Thursday, November 5, 2009 at 04:59PM | Registered CommenterFewsOrange

Fews

LOL!

Thursday, November 5, 2009 at 05:01PM | Registered CommenterPeter

Education is generally held to be a good thing, so why the problem with sex education? If it's age-appropriate, I believe it leads to: less adolescent confusion and mistakes (like pregnancy or STDs) & a balanced adult capable of a fulfilling relationship.
My experiences, growing up in the seventies, would have been greatly improved if I'd been less ignorant.
Parents usually suffer from embarrassment and inaccuracies when broaching this subject, so a school lesson is the best for all children. Of course, whether it's right to start basic information at so young an age is debatable.
The only objections would come from religionists, some of whom it seems, would want their offspring as ignorant as themselves, which is despicable.

Thursday, November 5, 2009 at 05:44PM | Unregistered CommenterEd P

FewsOrange - damn that was good.

Thursday, November 5, 2009 at 06:50PM | Registered CommenterMahons

FewsOranges,

Maybe if people concentrated more on the content of biology lessons that evidently left such an impression on you there would be less abortions, what do you think?

Thursday, November 5, 2009 at 07:18PM | Registered CommenterDavid Vance

I don't think that parents have a right to deny their children basic education.

Thursday, November 5, 2009 at 07:44PM | Registered Commenteraileen

Take out the word education and I can wholeheartedly agree with the title of this post ;)

Thursday, November 5, 2009 at 08:36PM | Registered CommenterColm

>>At present parents can remove their children from lessons about sex until they are 19.<<

Hardly, David. Apart from locking their offspring in cellars etc, nobody can prevent anyone else from learning about sex until he or she is 19.

Thursday, November 5, 2009 at 09:01PM | Registered CommenterNoel Cunningham

Ed P:-
"Parents usually suffer from embarrassment and inaccuracies"

--HOW THE HECK DID THEY MANAGE TO GET YOU THEN??

Thursday, November 5, 2009 at 09:49PM | Unregistered CommenterJohn Winlow

John Winlow: Please don't take a phrase out of context and then make a stupid comment about it. If you bothered to read the entire sentence, you would see your comment is silly and distorts my point. (I take it all back if you are a politician, as, in that case, your technique will ensue a glittering career!)

Friday, November 6, 2009 at 11:15AM | Unregistered CommenterEd P

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>