DV TWITTERING

RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
THE PRICE OF REWARDING TERRORISM

You do not defeat terrorism by rewarding terrorists, regardless of how many bleeding heart liberals argue otherwise. Want to know where that flawed approach leads to? Read UNIONISM DECAYED 1997-2007 - It's my first book and it explains what happens when you seeek to appease terrorists and call it peace. It's available right now for ATW readers so make sure you get your copy by emailing the editor! This is the book that dissents from the herd mentality that doing wrong can lead to being right. It doesn't and this book spells out WHY.

HIT THE TIP JAR!
More About This Website

 

THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT

We'd really like to have you comment on our site! We want good conversation, no abuse and no trolls. I reserve the right to ban anybody who wilfully and persistently breaks these rules. So go ahead and speak your mind!

Can America Trust the BBC?


"I do remember... the corridors of Broadcasting House were strewn with empty champagne bottles. I'll always remember that", Jane Garvey, BBC Five Live, May 10th, 2007, recalling May 2nd, 1997.

Login
Powered by Squarespace
Powered by Squarespace
SEARCH ATW
SITEMETER

« TALK RADIO UPDATE | Main | Allister to be proved wrong »
Thursday
29Mar2007

So Much for the Commons

John Reid, the SoS who's not fit for purpose, today announced to the House of Commons that the Home Office would be split into two.  Responsibility for the Probation Service, prisons and prevention of re-offending will be taken over by the Department for Constitutional Affairs, which will subsequently be re-named the Ministry of Justice.

My annoyance is not with the actual separation of this department, rather in the manner the news was broadcast.  The Home Office is, arguably, the most important department of state after the Treasury.  Its decisions impact greatly on the lives of ordinary people - in all sorts of ways.  Given the magnitude of the Office, coupled with the importance of its dichotomy, wouldn't it have been more appropriate to have a full debate on the floor of the House of Commons?  Instead we have an announcement on the last Thursday of the Parliamentary session.

This episode once again shows the contempt Labour has for the concept of Executive accountability.  This is not some third-rate office we're talking about.  It should have been opened up to full scrutiny and a vote then taken.  If the vote was for separation, so be it.  MPs are not cannon fodder to be whipped into line on crucial votes; they are elected to debate legislation and proposition.  What's next in this demonstration of contempt?  Doing away with elections altogether?

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (2)

Ministry of Justice? Shouldn't that be Ministry of Love (Miniluv, in Newspeak)? o_0
Thursday, March 29, 2007 at 04:24PM | Unregistered CommenterThe Cynical Libertarian
Apparently they're rushing this through before Gordon takes over because he's dead against the idea. So much for democracy.

Probably a good idea in principle, but sure as shooting they'll make a total mess of it.
Thursday, March 29, 2007 at 09:30PM | Registered CommenterPeter

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>