DV TWITTERING

RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
THE PRICE OF REWARDING TERRORISM

You do not defeat terrorism by rewarding terrorists, regardless of how many bleeding heart liberals argue otherwise. Want to know where that flawed approach leads to? Read UNIONISM DECAYED 1997-2007 - It's my first book and it explains what happens when you seeek to appease terrorists and call it peace. It's available right now for ATW readers so make sure you get your copy by emailing the editor! This is the book that dissents from the herd mentality that doing wrong can lead to being right. It doesn't and this book spells out WHY.

HIT THE TIP JAR!
More About This Website

 

THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT

We'd really like to have you comment on our site! We want good conversation, no abuse and no trolls. I reserve the right to ban anybody who wilfully and persistently breaks these rules. So go ahead and speak your mind!

Can America Trust the BBC?


"I do remember... the corridors of Broadcasting House were strewn with empty champagne bottles. I'll always remember that", Jane Garvey, BBC Five Live, May 10th, 2007, recalling May 2nd, 1997.

Login
Powered by Squarespace
Powered by Squarespace
SEARCH ATW
SITEMETER

« OBAMA'S MAGIC WORKING OUT WELL... | Main | WE'RE JAMMING... »
Monday
23Nov2009

US MILITARY ARE FROM MARS, UK MILITARY ARE FROM VENUS

I thought it was interesting to read that the British chief of staff in Iraq, Colonel J.K.Tanner, described his US military counterparts as “a group of Martians” for whom “dialogue is alien,” saying: “Despite our so-called ‘special relationship,’ I reckon we were treated no differently to the Portuguese."

Leaked documents go to paint a vivid picture of the clash between what UK General Stewart described as “war-war” American commanders and their British counterparts, who he said preferred a “jaw-jaw” approach.

And THAT my friends is precisely what is wrong with the British strategy. It seems to believe that it can talk itself to victory when in fact the US fighting approach is the superior one. You win wars by killing your enemies and denying them ALL prospect of hope. In that regard the US attitude is to be commended. The UK approach, conditioned by years fighting here in Northern Ireland, is that winning hearts and minds is the sophisticated and modern way forward. I don't think it is but I do feel that the hostility evident in the UK attitude towards US commanders is disturbing and certainly not one that I sympathise with!

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (4)

Don'y you thik this is the problem when you have a government which doesn't share your enthusiasm for
books?
.....especially history books!

Monday, November 23, 2009 at 10:21AM | Registered CommenterDanny Boy

If we don't learn from it, we are destined to make the same mistakes.

Monday, November 23, 2009 at 11:01AM | Unregistered CommenterDavid Vance

You are quite right David - look where 'winning hearts and minds' has got us.

Monday, November 23, 2009 at 02:07PM | Unregistered Commentermarlloy

The British army should know that we have the Archbishop of Canterbury and legions of social workers we can deploy against the Taliban if indeed we have a strategy of jaw jaw. I feel sure they could jaw jaw the taliban to death. But our record in Iraq was dreadful and our retreat from Basra to skulk behind defensive lines in our base while the yanks and the Iraqis dealt with the shia was something the army will find it difficult to live down. The equally useless Foreign and Commonwealth Office are purpose made for doing the talking. What has happened to our country when the generals whine about talk talk and the sailors cry because their i-pods are confiscated?

Monday, November 23, 2009 at 02:54PM | Unregistered CommenterFrank

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>